View Zero Trust Service Catalogue 1 Match IdentityVerifiable Credentials

Zero Trust Service Catalogue

UNIFY's identity-first catalogue spanning the core Zero Trust pillars.

IDENTITY

Capabilities that establish, migrate, and assure digital identities.

  • Trusted Sign-in
  • Streamlined Identity Lifecycle
  • Verifiable Credentials
  • Identity Protection
  • Migration to Entra
  • Identity Verification and Proofing
  • Application Provisioning
  • Identity SOC
ACCESS

Controls that govern how users, customers, and partners gain the right access.

  • Secure External Access
  • Organisational Identity Access Management
  • Controlled Delegation
  • Partner Identity Access Management
  • Just-In-Time Privilege
  • Adaptive Access
  • Multifactor Identification
  • Risk-Based Authentication
GOVERNANCE

Oversight capabilities that enforce policy, compliance, and least privilege.

  • Enterprise Governance
  • Controlled Delegation
  • Access Lifecycle
  • Entitlement Management
  • Data Protected
  • Access Reviews
  • Just-In-Time Privilege
  • Adaptive Access
SECURITY

Security operations services that protect, detect, and respond across identities.

  • Intelligent Threat Detection
  • Dark Web & Supply Chain Insight
  • Information Protection and Governance
  • Endpoint & Cloud Protection
  • Vulnerability Management
  • Security Operations Centre as a Service (SOCaaS)
  • Risk Management

For public and regulated-sector leaders, VC adoption is a policy and governance program: set the trust rules, prove assurance, then scale ecosystem participation.

Adoption models

Minimal viable ecosystem
Pilot with a small set of issuers and verifiers to prove value and usability.
Federated multi‑organisation
Multiple issuers and verifiers operate under a shared trust framework.
Broader ecosystem participation
Extend trust to regulated partners once governance and lifecycle controls are proven.

In plain English: begin with a small pilot, add more issuers/verifiers under shared rules, then open it up.


Capability map

Identity & attributes
Reuse authoritative identity and attribute sources rather than rebuild.
Issuance & lifecycle
Issuance is simple; lifecycle, refresh, and revocation drive real-world complexity.
Presentation & wallets
Wallet diversity is a strength when aligned to shared assurance requirements.
Trust & interoperability
Accreditation, registries, and profiles make standards work at scale.

In plain English: reuse what you already have for identity, focus effort on lifecycle and trust.

Why it matters: each capability is a policy lever for assurance, privacy, and interoperability outcomes.


Cost and scaling

Role-based setup
Issuer and verifier onboarding costs are largely one‑off and reusable.
Lifecycle-driven OPEX
Ongoing cost scales with lifecycle events and verification volume.
Decoupled scale
Verification scales without proportional load on authoritative registries.
Flexible delivery
SaaS and self‑operated models can coexist under shared governance.

In plain English: setup is mostly one‑off, but ongoing costs track usage and lifecycle events.

Why it matters: funding models should anticipate verification volume and lifecycle operations, not just initial build.


Suggested next steps

Define trust foundations
Establish assurance levels, accreditation criteria, and registry governance.
Pilot low‑risk use cases
Validate usability, verifier expectations, and lifecycle design.
Prove lifecycle controls
Exercise revocation, refresh, and status checks early.
Scale through accreditation
Expand participation while preserving assurance and interoperability.

In plain English: define trust rules, run a low‑risk pilot, test revocation early, then scale.


Policy levers that shape adoption

  • Accreditation rules decide who can issue, verify, and under what assurance tiers.
  • Trust registries publish authoritative lists of approved participants and metadata.
  • Privacy and disclosure define what can be shared, for what purpose, and under what consent.
  • Wallet requirements set usability and security baselines for holders.
  • Lifecycle controls (status, refresh, revocation) anchor real‑world risk management.

What success looks like

  • Interoperable credentials across agencies and sectors without bespoke integration.
  • Clear assurance tiers matched to risk and service sensitivity.
  • Measurable reduction in onboarding and verification friction.
  • Governance that enables new issuers/verifiers to onboard predictably.

How Verifiable Credential ecosystems are structured, governed, and scaled.
See typical use cases and operating patterns for Verifiable Credentials.
Looks good!
Please enter your name.
Looks good!
Please enter your company.
Looks good!
Please enter your e-mail address so we can contact you.
This form uses Google ReCaptcha to ensure interactions with our site are from legitimate users. Please accept the use of recommended storage before submitting the form. Find out more at the Privacy Center.
Your message has been sent. You should hear from us soon.
Your message could not be sent. Try again later.

You may also be interested in:

A practical, standards-aligned view of Verifiable Credentials for organisations building trusted ecosystems.